1.
Dietary alteration of n-3 and n-6 fatty acids for headache reduction in adults with migraine: randomized controlled trial.
Ramsden, CE, Zamora, D, Faurot, KR, MacIntosh, B, Horowitz, M, Keyes, GS, Yuan, ZX, Miller, V, Lynch, C, Honvoh, G, et al
BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2021;374:n1448
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
This study could be of interest to practitioners who are interested in dietary interventions that may decrease the incidence or severity of headaches in women. Omega 3 fatty acids such as eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) are believed to be precursors for molecules that may have pain reducing properties. Whereas omega 6 fatty acids such as linoleic acid are believed to be precursors for molecules that may have pain promoting effects. The objective of this 3 armed randomised, double blinded controlled trial was to determine whether increasing dietary intake of omega 3 EPA and DHA, whilst either maintaining or decreasing omega 6 linoleic acid, may lead to a decrease in headache frequency and severity. 182 participants were assigned into one of 3 treatment groups, the first, H3 diet, increasing EPA and DHA to 1.5g/day and maintaining linoleic acid, the second, H3-L6 diet, increasing EPA and DHA to 1.5g/day whilst decreasing linoleic acid and the control group maintaining EPA, DHA and linoleic acid. Both the H3 and H3-L6 diets increased the levels of the molecule believed to be involved in reducing pain to a statistically significant level. This was found to be consistent with the results reported by the patients both in headache hours per day and days with headache in the month. The authors conclude that increasing levels of omega 3 fatty acids in the diet whilst decreasing levels of omega 6 fatty acids in the diet may decrease the frequency and severity of headaches. This study was for 16 weeks and predominantly women with a mean age of 38, further studies for longer and on other populations such as men, children and older populations, would be required to see if the same results could be obtained.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Important from a public health perspective
- Increasing n-3 levels and decreasing n-6 levels could be modified by dietary change and appear to reduce the frequency and duration of headaches in migraine sufferers
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Background
Circulating lipid mediators have been implicated in headache pathogenesis.
Objective
To determine whether dietary interventions that increase n-3 fatty acids with and without reduction in n-6 linoleic acid can alter circulating lipid mediators implicated in headache pathogenesis, and decrease headache in adults with migraine.
Study Design
Three arm, parallel group, randomized, modified double blind, controlled trial.
Participants
182 participants (88% women, mean age 38 years) with migraines on 5-20 days per month (67% met criteria for chronic migraine).
Interventions
Three diets designed with eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and linoleic acid altered as controlled variables:
- H3 diet (n=61)—increase EPA+DHA to 1.5 g/day and maintain linoleic acid at around 7% of total energy intake
- H3-L6 diet (n=61)—increase n-3 EPA+DHA to 1.5 g/day and decrease linoleic acid to ≤1.8% of total energy intake
- Control diet (n=60)—maintain EPA+DHA at <150 mg/day and linoleic acid at around 7% of total energy intake
All participants received foods accounting for two thirds of daily food energy and 1/3rd from foods not provided by the Research Kitchen. For these foods participants rely on their training by the dietitian and website diet guides for shopping and choosing foods in restaurants. Participants were encouraged to continue seeing their headache physician and continue usual care.
Results
In intention-to-treat analyses (n=182) at 16 weeks
- The H3-L6 and H3 diets increased circulating 17-HDHA compared with the control diet (baseline-adjusted mean difference 0.6, 95% confidence interval 0.2 to 0.9; 0.7, 0.4 to 1.1, respectively).
- The observed improvement in HIT-6 scores (quality of life) in the H3-L6 and H3 groups was not statistically significant (−1.6, −4.2 to 1.0, and −1.5, −4.2 to 1.2, respectively).
- Compared with the control diet, the H3-L6 and H3 diets decreased total headache hours per day (−1.7, −2.5 to −0.9, and −1.3, −2.1 to −0.5, respectively), moderate to severe headache hours per day, (−0.8, −1.2 to −0.4, and −0.7, −1.1 to −0.3, respectively) and headache days per month (−4.0, −5.2 to −2.7, and −2.0, −3.3 to −0.7, respectively).
- The H3-L6 diet decreased headache days per month more than the H3 diet, suggesting additional benefit from lowering dietary linoleic acid (−2.0, −3.2 to −0.8).
- The H3-L6 and H3 diets altered n-3 and n-6 fatty acids and several of their nociceptive oxylipin derivatives in plasma, serum, erythrocytes or immune cells, but did not alter classic headache mediators calcitonin gene related peptide and prostaglandin E2.
Conclusions
The H3-L6 and H3 interventions altered bioactive mediators implicated in headache pathogenesis and decreased frequency and severity of headaches, but did not significantly improve quality of life.
Clinical practice applications:
These findings might be useful for Nutritional Therapists and Clinical Practitioners:
- To inform practitioners of the benefits of assessing n-3 and n-6 fatty acids in migraine patients.
- Inform practitioners of the potential benefits to reducing n-6 as well as increasing n-3 levels in migraine patients
- Inform practitioners of the potential lack of correlation between headache duration and frequency and quality of life measures
Considerations for future research:
- Trialing larger doses of n-3
- Longer term follow up whilst maintaining these diets
- Attempting to validate an optimal serum level of 17-HDHA for these patients that could be used in clinical practice
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether dietary interventions that increase n-3 fatty acids with and without reduction in n-6 linoleic acid can alter circulating lipid mediators implicated in headache pathogenesis, and decrease headache in adults with migraine. DESIGN Three arm, parallel group, randomized, modified double blind, controlled trial. SETTING Ambulatory, academic medical center in the United States over 16 weeks. PARTICIPANTS 182 participants (88% women, mean age 38 years) with migraines on 5-20 days per month (67% met criteria for chronic migraine). INTERVENTIONS Three diets designed with eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and linoleic acid altered as controlled variables: H3 diet (n=61)-increase EPA+DHA to 1.5 g/day and maintain linoleic acid at around 7% of energy; H3-L6 diet (n=61)-increase n-3 EPA+DHA to 1.5 g/day and decrease linoleic acid to ≤1.8% of energy; control diet (n=60)-maintain EPA+DHA at <150 mg/day and linoleic acid at around 7% of energy. All participants received foods accounting for two thirds of daily food energy and continued usual care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary endpoints (week 16) were the antinociceptive mediator 17-hydroxydocosahexaenoic acid (17-HDHA) in blood and the headache impact test (HIT-6), a six item questionnaire assessing headache impact on quality of life. Headache frequency was assessed daily with an electronic diary. RESULTS In intention-to-treat analyses (n=182), the H3-L6 and H3 diets increased circulating 17-HDHA (log ng/mL) compared with the control diet (baseline-adjusted mean difference 0.6, 95% confidence interval 0.2 to 0.9; 0.7, 0.4 to 1.1, respectively). The observed improvement in HIT-6 scores in the H3-L6 and H3 groups was not statistically significant (-1.6, -4.2 to 1.0, and -1.5, -4.2 to 1.2, respectively). Compared with the control diet, the H3-L6 and H3 diets decreased total headache hours per day (-1.7, -2.5 to -0.9, and -1.3, -2.1 to -0.5, respectively), moderate to severe headache hours per day (-0.8, -1.2 to -0.4, and -0.7, -1.1 to -0.3, respectively), and headache days per month (-4.0, -5.2 to -2.7, and -2.0, -3.3 to -0.7, respectively). The H3-L6 diet decreased headache days per month more than the H3 diet (-2.0, -3.2 to -0.8), suggesting additional benefit from lowering dietary linoleic acid. The H3-L6 and H3 diets altered n-3 and n-6 fatty acids and several of their nociceptive oxylipin derivatives in plasma, serum, erythrocytes or immune cells, but did not alter classic headache mediators calcitonin gene related peptide and prostaglandin E2. CONCLUSIONS The H3-L6 and H3 interventions altered bioactive mediators implicated in headache pathogenesis and decreased frequency and severity of headaches, but did not significantly improve quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02012790.
2.
Reductions in anti-inflammatory gut bacteria are associated with depression in a sample of young adults.
Liu, RT, Rowan-Nash, AD, Sheehan, AE, Walsh, RFL, Sanzari, CM, Korry, BJ, Belenky, P
Brain, behavior, and immunity. 2020;88:308-324
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Alterations to the gut microbiota may be associated with depression and anxiety disorders through a pathway known as the gut-brain axis. Inflammation may be the mediator between the two, as individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) have reported high levels of inflammation, which the gut microbiota may have the capacity to protect against. This observational study of the gut microbiota of 90 young adults with MDD and 47 healthy controls aimed to determine the relationship between inflammatory gut microbiota and symptoms of depression. The results showed changes to several species of gut microbiota in those with MDD and that the level of change was related to MDD symptom severity. These changes were observed even in those taking psychotropic medications. Changes at the taxonomic level indicated that those with higher symptoms of depression had more pronounced differences compared with healthy controls. Although the observed differences were indicative of an inflammatory microbiome, no changes were observed in blood markers of inflammation between those individuals with MDD and healthy controls. It was concluded that the gut microbiome of individuals with MDD was different from healthy individuals in favour of an inflammatory environment. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that the status of the gut microbiota may be an important measure in individuals with MDD and that a treatment plan to ensure gut health is considered may help with symptoms of depression.
Abstract
We assessed the gut microbiota of 90 American young adults, comparing 43 participants with major depressive disorder (MDD) and 47 healthy controls, and found that the MDD subjects had significantly different gut microbiota compared to the healthy controls at multiple taxonomic levels. At the phylum level, participants with MDD had lower levels of Firmicutes and higher levels of Bacteroidetes, with similar trends in the at the class (Clostridia and Bacteroidia) and order (Clostridiales and Bacteroidales) levels. At the genus level, the MDD group had lower levels of Faecalibacterium and other related members of the family Ruminococcaceae, which was also reduced relative to healthy controls. Additionally, the class Gammaproteobacteria and genus Flavonifractor were enriched in participants with MDD. Accordingly, predicted functional differences between the two groups include a reduced abundance of short-chain fatty acid production pathways in the MDD group. We also demonstrated that the magnitude of taxonomic changes was associated with the severity of depressive symptoms in many cases, and that most changes were present regardless of whether depressed participants were taking psychotropic medications. Overall, our results support a link between MDD and lower levels of anti-inflammatory, butyrate-producing bacteria, and may support a connection between the gut microbiota and the chronic, low-grade inflammation often observed in MDD patients.
3.
Immediate and long-term consequences of COVID-19 infections for the development of neurological disease.
Heneka, MT, Golenbock, D, Latz, E, Morgan, D, Brown, R
Alzheimer's research & therapy. 2020;12(1):69
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Covid-19 may cause brain dysfunction evidenced by symptoms individuals experience once they have contracted the disease. Loss of smell, taste and confusion have all been reported by patients and a number of severe cases have reported incidences of stroke. These are all of concern, as Covid-19 can severely affect the elderly who ordinarily are the most likely to suffer from brain disorders. This small review paper of 27 studies stated that there are four possible ways in which Covid-19 may affect the brain, which put Covid-19 sufferers at an increased risk of long-term brain disorders. This was supported by findings, which showed one third of Covid-19 patients leave hospital with evidence of brain dysfunction. Inflammation was heavily reviewed by the authors as a possible causal factor. It was concluded that patients who survive Covid-19 infection are at an increased risk for developing brain disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, however it was acknowledged that further studies are required. Clinicians could use this study to understand the possible need for both short-term and long-term monitoring of brain function in individuals who have survived Covid-19, especially if they are elderly.
Abstract
Increasing evidence suggests that infection with Sars-CoV-2 causes neurological deficits in a substantial proportion of affected patients. While these symptoms arise acutely during the course of infection, less is known about the possible long-term consequences for the brain. Severely affected COVID-19 cases experience high levels of proinflammatory cytokines and acute respiratory dysfunction and often require assisted ventilation. All these factors have been suggested to cause cognitive decline. Pathogenetically, this may result from direct negative effects of the immune reaction, acceleration or aggravation of pre-existing cognitive deficits, or de novo induction of a neurodegenerative disease. This article summarizes the current understanding of neurological symptoms of COVID-19 and hypothesizes that affected patients may be at higher risk of developing cognitive decline after overcoming the primary COVID-19 infection. A structured prospective evaluation should analyze the likelihood, time course, and severity of cognitive impairment following the COVID-19 pandemic.
4.
Pharmaceutical Interventions in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Literature-based Commentary.
Richman, S, Morris, MC, Broderick, G, Craddock, TJA, Klimas, NG, Fletcher, MA
Clinical therapeutics. 2019;41(5):798-805
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Myalgic encephalomyelitis, also known as Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/ CFS), is a disease characterized by an inability to exert oneself physically, often coupled with a combination of other symptoms, including sleep disorders, severe unpredictable pain, and compromised cognitive abilities. The aim of this review was to delineate a number of the more prominent treatments for ME/CFS into different categories and evaluate the methods and results of corresponding drug trials. Results indicate that: • antiviral drugs appear to show limited efficacy in treating ME/CFS over a broad demographic. • there is a lack of clinical research focusing on the use of specific cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors [analgesic] to treat ME/CFS. • antidepressants may be of use in delivering improvements in the quality of life of patients with ME/CFS. • recalibration of endocrine-immune regulation may be involved in supporting the persistence of ME/CFS and may be responsible at least in part for its resistance to single agent interventions. Authors conclude that there is a great need for larger, longitudinal studies focused on a more clearly defined subset of ME/CFS as well as a greater consideration of potential synergies between interventions and the suitability of combination therapies.
Abstract
Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a debilitating disorder characterized by prolonged periods of fatigue, chronic pain, depression, and a complex constellation of other symptoms. Currently, ME/CFS has no known cause, nor are the mechanisms of illness well understood. Therefore, with few exceptions, attempts to treat ME/CFS have been directed mainly toward symptom management. These treatments include antivirals, pain relievers, antidepressants, and oncologic agents as well as other single-intervention treatments. Results of these trials have been largely inconclusive and, in some cases, contradictory. Contributing factors include a lack of well-designed and -executed studies and the highly heterogeneous nature of ME/CFS, which has made a single etiology difficult to define. Because the majority of single-intervention treatments have shown little efficacy, it may instead be beneficial to explore broader-acting combination therapies in which a more focused precision-medicine approach is supported by a systems-level analysis of endocrine and immune co-regulation.
5.
The Sleep-Immune Crosstalk in Health and Disease.
Besedovsky, L, Lange, T, Haack, M
Physiological reviews. 2019;99(3):1325-1380
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The interaction between sleep and immunity is an established phenomena. This thorough review article summarises sleep changes in response to both infectious and non-infectious immune system challenges and describes the role of sleep in supporting the immune system. Details are provided of how sleep affects the innate immune system (first line, rapid defence against infection) as well as the adaptive immune system (second line, delayed defence against infection), using a feedback system which promotes host defence. Sleep is associated with reduced infection risk and can improve infection outcome and vaccination responses. Sleep deprivation is also associated with chronic, low-grade inflammation. Nutrition Practitioners wishing to support immunity can focus on sleep as a simple lifestyle measure to enhance resilience.
Abstract
Sleep and immunity are bidirectionally linked. Immune system activation alters sleep, and sleep in turn affects the innate and adaptive arm of our body's defense system. Stimulation of the immune system by microbial challenges triggers an inflammatory response, which, depending on its magnitude and time course, can induce an increase in sleep duration and intensity, but also a disruption of sleep. Enhancement of sleep during an infection is assumed to feedback to the immune system to promote host defense. Indeed, sleep affects various immune parameters, is associated with a reduced infection risk, and can improve infection outcome and vaccination responses. The induction of a hormonal constellation that supports immune functions is one likely mechanism underlying the immune-supporting effects of sleep. In the absence of an infectious challenge, sleep appears to promote inflammatory homeostasis through effects on several inflammatory mediators, such as cytokines. This notion is supported by findings that prolonged sleep deficiency (e.g., short sleep duration, sleep disturbance) can lead to chronic, systemic low-grade inflammation and is associated with various diseases that have an inflammatory component, like diabetes, atherosclerosis, and neurodegeneration. Here, we review available data on this regulatory sleep-immune crosstalk, point out methodological challenges, and suggest questions open for future research.